[video]
Grim Natwick, anatomy studies.
Image c/o Stephen Worth / Animation Archive.
(via fuckyeahmedicaldiagrams)
[video]
[video]
[video]
[video]
“Teratophoneus WIP3”, by Sergey Krasovskiy (~atrox1)
“Teratophoneus (meaning “monstrous murderer”) is a genus of carnivorous tyrannosaurid”
[video]
Hello all, sorry for the limited postings and not being on. I’ve been laid up in the hospital for the last two weeks or so. Probably I won’t be on much in the future either. We’ll see how things happen.
[video]
[video]
Without looking at the numbers on the apples, can you guess the programs used?
I often hear the claim that digital art is easier because the computer or the program does the work. Added to that I hear complaints form people who say “I don’t have Photoshop” as if the lack of Photoshop is a fine excuse for a lack of skill in digital rendering.
But it is not the program or the computer that makes digital paintings good, it is the skill, experience, and education of the artist. A god artist can take any medium, and after learning it can produce great works. Why? Because a good artist already has mastered the fundamentals of art such as form, shape, color theory, value, light, and they’ve already trained their brain to draw what they see. Just as it is not the pencil that enables drawing, it is not the tool that makes the beauty of the artwork, it is the hand and eye of the artist.
To prove that it is not the program, but the artist that makes all the difference in the quality of digital art a friend of mine Arshes Nei, made a series of apple paintings all done in different digital art programs. I will post the answers in my next blog.
“Repetition” by the skilled Ryohei Hase.
[video]